Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 443"

From L'avenir de l'humanité
(Comment provided by Sheila - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Cat - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 
--[[User:Sheila|Sheila]] 17:36, 15 July 2012 (BST)
 
--[[User:Sheila|Sheila]] 17:36, 15 July 2012 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Cat said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Yes Sheila, I watched the video again last night and there are a couple of things that stand out to me, being that the Plejaran have stated this already; when Reed approached the being, he was violently ill, diahorrea etc, and the video camera not working within  a certain proximity of the craft or being.I just don't see anyone putting together this much detail to try and convince us.  I would think having an alien body on film was enough without the video evidence of coming across it, your dog being killed, a craft etc.  Then the deaths of those who supported him...now that's when things become more interesting.
 +
 +
--[[User:Cat|Cat]] 19:30, 15 July 2012 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 18:30, 15 July 2012

Comments on Contact Report 443 <comments />


Reginald said ...

The comments of Ptaah are a bit harsh are they not? History was my favourite subject at school. And I have been reading Eich von Däniken and Zacharia Sitchin. The first Von Däniken's are interesting mindblowing conceptions. At least they made people aware and think, that history might have been differently from what we have learned at school. So the more i browse the contactreports the more i get the impression Ptaah has turned into an older and frustrated man. Sorry to say. Nothing a nice vacation in holland could not cure.

--Reginald 14:56, 2 May 2010 (BST)

Lorita said ...

I find that a fair amount of the comments regarding humans/potentials, etc rather harsh but we were warned we might not like all we read/hear. This isn't a fairy tale.

--Lorita 05:27, 22 May 2010 (BST)

Mark said ...

I presume they are referring to the V series on TV. :) I would rather be taken over by large dinosaurs, rather than disguised reptiles who pose as humans. j/k It's all about the money with these storytellers. One thing our dear planet Earth has is storytellers. If you want to hear the most untrue stories in the universe. Come one, come all beings of Dern or any other universe. I wouldn't be surprised if other beings from space trying to take over Earth, overall I would give our defense a rating of clumsical. We are improving though.

--Mark 20:19, 22 May 2010 (BST)

Jay1010101 said ...

Reptilian do exist, the Annunaki story may be true, check out htis video proof of Johnathan Reed on youtube at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKCq1ISd7zY&feature=related

--Jay1010101 02:56, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Zameen said ...

jay: nope

--Zameen 05:27, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Hawaiian said ...

Yeah Sheila, you're right about Zameen. His four letter word response says it all in a most efficient manner directly to the point that is quite emotional stimulating at the same time! All these books on fantasy based on fear really sells because only the ignorant which unfortunately comprises of the vast majority on this planet are influenced by it and buys into its agenda.

Ptaah agrees and is learning some new words from BEAM like "hacks", I just wonder what is the symbolic representation used in the 7th sense spiritual telepathy for such words in particular?

--Hawaiian 03:44, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Cat said ...

Jay - I first watched the Jonathan Reed videos years ago and they were impressive. I still don't know where I stand on this, in fact I'm sitting. On the fence. I do question how someone would or could go to this much effort to create a humanoid being that was indeed so lifelike, I think at one stage, it's eyes were moving. There's really no reason why it couldn't be true, we don't have a contact report translated that states anything to the contrary and Jonathan Reed has never been named by the Plejaran as one of the 'fakes'. (That I know of.) It's certainly an interesting few videos and others have put their reputations on the line to back him up so I'm willing to keep an open mind. ps...I wouldn't call that particular being a 'reptilian', it's simply android/humanoid type (no genitalia etc)

--Cat 08:19, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Sheila said ...

I wouldn't paint everyone with a hack brush, Hawaiian. As a one time newbie, there were many things I was unsure of too - this being one of them. We can all look back at previous posts of ours and go what the heck were we thinking. I agree with you Cat, I too am on the fence. The android seemed to have used logical force when being attacked by the dog and may have disintegrated it into energy. Jonathan Reed's credentials seemed to have gotten flushed and that is always suspicious when someone is made into a persona non grata. The kicker was the scream this being made which oddly brought tears to my eyes. How does that happen unless empathy is universal?

--Sheila 17:36, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Cat said ...

Yes Sheila, I watched the video again last night and there are a couple of things that stand out to me, being that the Plejaran have stated this already; when Reed approached the being, he was violently ill, diahorrea etc, and the video camera not working within a certain proximity of the craft or being.I just don't see anyone putting together this much detail to try and convince us. I would think having an alien body on film was enough without the video evidence of coming across it, your dog being killed, a craft etc. Then the deaths of those who supported him...now that's when things become more interesting.

--Cat 19:30, 15 July 2012 (BST)