Difference between revisions of "Talk:Asket's Explanations - Part 8"
From L'avenir de l'humanité
(Comment provided by Kkeschoi - via ArticleComments extension) |
Milind Bokil (talk | contribs) (Comment provided by Milind Bokil - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
--[[User:Kkeschoi|Kkeschoi]] 14:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Kkeschoi|Kkeschoi]] 14:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Milind Bokil said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | 221. God was never put on a level with Creation by me, because God is a creature of Creation as are you and I and every other human. | ||
| + | |||
| + | My question | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can we not name creation as "God" ? Isn’t “creation” conscious about itself? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Milind Bokil|Milind Bokil]] 07:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 07:23, 30 December 2010
--Sanjin 19:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)A word about relegeon, it seems to me like the ending syllable "eon" points to the meaning of "An indefinitely long period of time", or evolution toward infinity. Is this where this word comes from?
Kkeschoi said ...
Milind Bokil said ...
221. God was never put on a level with Creation by me, because God is a creature of Creation as are you and I and every other human.
My question
Can we not name creation as "God" ? Isn’t “creation” conscious about itself?
--Milind Bokil 07:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
why didn't Billy leave something writen about billy's life and hide it in the ground somewhere and then in the year 32, and then re-discover it our time, that would be amazing proof that can't be debunk, and he could do that when ever the ET take him back in time, which is very easy to do for them.
--Kkeschoi 14:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)